0 I'm sorry, but the number of 19-year-old white boys in MAGA hats who message me about how I need to find God and call me a degenerate is wild. Why don't you worry about yourself? I'm vibing, crushing it, and having fun.
12 Right-wing e-girl Twitter drama—if you haven't seen it, good. There was a big catfight on Twitter recently, which, honestly, is more evidence women don't belong in politics.
27 Sarah Stock, a young, pretty, right-wing e-girl, got engaged, but instead of congratulations, everyone had a problem with it. It took about 10 minutes for things to go from "I'm getting married" to chaos.
41 You've probably heard "the personal is political"—it means your emotions shape your beliefs. Female emotions, the speaker argues, are like plutonium: they need careful handling or they'll become uncontrollable.
55 Why am I telling you about right-wing e-girl Twitter drama? First, it gets clicks. Second, it's a great example to teach you about the difference between providing and deserving.
73 Even when women say they're conservative, they're still women, and women are natural "deservers." Their default setting is to deserve, and that's fine as long as they're getting things from people who agree to provide.
90 The problem is when people deserve things from those who don't agree to provide. That breaks the whole chain—if providers don't want to provide, they stop, and then nothing gets built.
113 That's why deservers can never be in charge of providers; it makes providing look like a bad deal, so providers quit, and you can't just go out into nature and expect things to appear for you.
139 When deserving is in charge, men get frustrated because women start deserving everything away from men, until men don't have enough left to be deserved, and then they don't get married—either because they can't afford it, or they're afraid she'll deserve their house.
163 This Twitter drama is a great example of how deserving works. The girls tore each other apart because someone got a ring, which means "I deserve attention and status," but not all of them actually provided valuable content.
185 So, even though they say they're conservative, they're acting in "deservy" ways. The speaker is going to go through the drama bit by bit and give a right-wing e-girl tier list based on providing versus deserving.
201 The red upward arrow in the Self-Max logo symbolizes making things happen—turning ideas into actions that shape your environment. Selfmax is about teaching you to do this.
221 The environment section is blue because that's where stuff comes from. Deservers want stuff to just come from the environment, like Santa. The speaker wants you to know how to make your desires reality, but also to understand deserving.
243 The speaker complains about deserving a lot, calling it "being the table." It's why some people pretend to be victims—if someone hurts you, they owe you. That's why so many divorced women claim abuse; sometimes it just means wanting more stuff.
278 Deserving is why the "mystery zone" exists—to conceal deserving. Like, "You should do what I want even if I don't say it." Evolutionarily, men had to get stuff from the environment, women had to deserve it. That's why they all want to be princesses—the most deserving one.
316 These arrows—providing and deserving—are basically masculine/feminine, active/passive, creating/consuming. "I'm going to get what I want from the world" versus "I deserve what I want from what you got."
329 Deserving isn't bad. Women and children are supposed to deserve, men are supposed to provide. You don't tell a woman, "Go hunt the mammoth yourself." That never happened, despite what some claim.
346 Providers only provide if they care about the people they're providing for. The speaker doesn't want just anyone deserving from them, but right now, they feel like they have to pay infinite deservers, or the police come get it.
361 You have to be able to recognize deserving when you see it. The speaker will point it out and comment on girl drama at the same time. By the end of the video, you should be able to tell when someone is providing value versus just deserving your attention.
376 The overview: right-wing influencer women had a big catfight, apparently all because one of them got married. No deeper reason was seen.
393 The first thing the speaker saw was someone mad about someone being mad about Sarah Stock getting engaged. There’s been tension between right-wing e-girls because they're girls and they hate each other. Sarah posts her ring; immediate drama.
415 The replies are divided into "kind of had a point" and "uncalled for." This matters for spotting deservers but not for public discourse because both led to escalation.
430 The key to identifying deserving: is this person providing anything of value, or just redirecting resources (like attention) to herself?
446 In a marketplace, you have to do something valuable and trade for something someone else did that you value. Providing is fighting for something and exchanging it; deserving is just saying, "I want my share."
470 This video helps you understand people—the speaker spent 20 years earning understanding and is now providing it to you, and you're providing attention (which becomes money). That's an exchange; that's providing.
499 Providing and deserving aren't opposites; they're like asking and answering. When the speaker posts a video, they're deserving your attention, but you don't have to watch. Deserving without exchange is just wanting attention for nothing.
517 Deserving only makes sense if there's an exchange—like if someone works for you, they deserve pay. Or if you hurt someone, they deserve compensation. Or your loved ones deserve support because you love them, and you get happiness back.
541 Watch out for people who deserve from you even though you get nothing. That upsets providers, so they either quit or try to do something about it.
552 The tier chart is a ratio of providing to deserving. If the e-girl provides value, she gets points; if she tears others down or asks for attention for nothing, points are subtracted. The list is just the speaker’s take.
573 The more deservy you are, the less of a conservative you get to be, because these women have careers based on not being at the bottom. The deserving happened fast—about 10 minutes from "I'm engaged" to "everyone but me is a..."
601 At this point, it wasn't about getting married anymore; it was about who slept with whom and who's broke. It took about two replies to get from "I got a ring" to chaos. The drama escalated and might still be going.
628 There were also takes from spectators. The top-scoring right-wing e-girls stayed out of the drama and only commented on the behavior, not getting involved.
644 The deserving happened in the drama itself. Here’s how it went: Sarah Stock posted her engagement. The speaker gives Sarah an A rating with 30% certainty—she’s been consistent, and the speaker saw a clip of her "ruining a guy’s day" with a true but unpopular fact.
688 Saying true things, even when unpopular, is a sign of value. Sarah gets an A, not S, because Pearl Davis made a valid point: Sarah posted her ring for attention and got offended when called out—classic "modern woman" cycle.
716 The speaker thinks it’s okay to post your wedding ring, but influencers do use their families and relationships for attention, which is "deservy." That’s asking to be included because of who you are, not what you did.
743 Pearl gets an A for similar reasons: drama and "ho scaring." Pearl points out that conservative women use their youth on themselves, then try to "stick the landing" at 32. Telling it like it is scares "hoes," but Pearl is right that showing the ring and not the man can be a bad sign.
793 In the worst case, the man is just paying to advertise her to the next guy—maximum deserving. You can’t be conservative and use men as stepping stones; that’s just feminism.
815 Half of these women can and will divorce their husbands and use their brand to market for husband number two. The speaker says he can’t tell if Pearl knows something or not, but she seems genuine and frustrated with women.
843 Pearl is great at pointing out tricks women play, but she plays them herself and admits it. She calls out women for things she does, but she’s honest about it. Pearl gets an A, 90% certainty.
860 Isabella Maria de Luca: the speaker doesn’t know her, but she was prominent in the drama in an unproductive way. She says she doesn’t post bikini pics but does, claims high purity—so, F, 20% certainty.
876 Morgan Ariel: the speaker never heard of her before, but now knows her for saying "you give it up for free" and other drama. F, 20% certainty.
888 The three right-wing e-girls who got an S didn’t get involved in the drama, just commented that drama is bad, which is enough. Shoe on Head, a longtime e-girl now more right-wing, gets S, 80% certainty.
915 Rachel Wilson, right-wing e-matron, married to Andrew Wilson, gets S, 99% certainty. She says what makes women happy isn’t what makes civilization function—feminism is systematic deserving.
950 Leonardo Joanie might be the only female comedian who’s ever said anything true about women—making fun of drama without getting involved. S, 85% certainty.
963 The big loser is Emily Saves America, F, 9% certainty. The speaker had never heard of her before, but she responded to criticism by getting personal and tearing down others, offering nothing but negativity.
992 Emily lives in LA, looks like a party girl, and says she’s vibing, crushing it, partying, and doing drugs because it makes her happy, while insulting her critics. The speaker says this is classic deserving behavior.
1037 Emily basically says it doesn’t matter what kind of content she provides; she deserves a reaction that makes her happy from supporters. The speaker thinks she doesn’t look happy—she’s just using her outside voice to convince everyone she’s fine.
1064 For everyone else: keep looking for deserving. The speaker points to a picture showing providing versus deserving; when you let deserving be in charge, you end up with nothing left except the bill.
1086 It’s not just women—it’s anyone who wants something from you and gives nothing back. Society trains us to be afraid to say no, but if you don’t defend your boundaries, no one respects you.
1110 Thanks for watching. The speaker has a new website and book—links are in the video description.
English 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Português
THE DESERVENING [Right-Wing E-Girl Drama Tier List]
THE DESERVENING [Right-Wing E-Girl Drama Tier List]
Right-Wing E-Girl Drama Breakdown
A recent Twitter conflict among right-wing female influencers is used to illustrate the concepts of "providing" and "deserving." hoe_math highlights how attention-seeking behaviors play out in online conservative influencer world. He critiques the tendency conservative women have of seeking validation and resources without providing corresponding value in return.hoe_math uses the principles of "Deserving" and "Providing" to rank the conservative e-girls recently involved in the Sarah Stock Engagement Twitter/X war. He encourages viewers to recognize and set boundaries against undeserved claims on their attention and resources. You just need to learn the importance of saying NO to deservers who provide little to nothing in return.
Enjoyed this article?
Subscribe to the free hoe_math Newsletter Insider
join the Newsletter